Rock the PHR Exam 2026 – Unleash Your HR Superpowers!

Question: 1 / 575

An employee who attempts to convince current employees to leave the company could be liable for violating:

Duty of loyalty clause.

The correct choice relates to the duty of loyalty clause, which emphasizes an employee's obligation to act in the best interests of their employer during their employment. This duty includes refraining from actions that could harm the company, such as persuading colleagues to leave the organization. When an employee actively tries to convince others to depart, it can be seen as a breach of this fundamental trust and responsibility, potentially leading to legal repercussions.

In contrast, the at-will doctrine primarily pertains to the ability of either the employer or the employee to terminate employment at any time without cause, making it less relevant in the context of active persuasion to leave. Restrictive covenants, which encompass various agreements that may limit actions like competing after leaving, do not specifically address the behavior of persuading current employees to resign. Similarly, while a non-solicitation agreement could apply in scenarios where an employee directly recruits others from the company, it is not as broadly encompassing as the duty of loyalty clause, which is inherently about the relationship and obligations between the employee and the employer throughout their time with the company.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

At-will doctrine.

Restrictive covenants.

Non-solicitation agreement.

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy